[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.59c] testsuite: 57 80 ... 225 failed
From: |
Stepan Kasal |
Subject: |
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.59c] testsuite: 57 80 ... 225 failed |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Jun 2005 22:01:14 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
Hello,
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 07:28:11PM +0200, Ralf Menzel wrote:
> - { $GREP -v \
> + { $EGREP -v \
> '^\(ac\|as\)_
> ^\(PPID\|RANDOM\|SECONDS\|'\'\\\$\''\)=
> ^[[^=]]*=$' $act_file
> --- snip ---
>
> Yes, that's all one 'E' makes the difference between over one hundred
> test cases failing or succeeding.
no, this means you are cheating: in egrep, regexp \(ac\|as\)_
would match string (ac|as)_ -- but that's not what we want to check.
You have to adapt the regular expressions for egrep.
See macro AT_CHECK_ENV for an interesting example related to this.
BTW: AT_CHECK_ENV uses $GREP -E, not $EGREP. Do you know why?
Shouldn't $EGREP be more portable?
Have a nice day,
Stepan Kasal
- [GNU Autoconf 2.59c] testsuite: 57 80 ... 225 failed, Ralf Menzel, 2005/06/07
- Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.59c] testsuite: 57 80 ... 225 failed,
Stepan Kasal <=
- Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.59c] testsuite: 57 80 ... 225 failed, Ralf Menzel, 2005/06/08
- Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.59c] testsuite: 57 80 ... 225 failed, Ralf Menzel, 2005/06/17
- Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.59c] testsuite: 57 80 ... 225 failed, Noah Misch, 2005/06/21
- Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.59c] testsuite: 57 80 ... 225 failed, Stepan Kasal, 2005/06/22
- Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.59c] testsuite: 57 80 ... 225 failed, Ralf Menzel, 2005/06/23
- Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.59c] testsuite: 57 80 ... 225 failed, Paul Eggert, 2005/06/23