[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.62 AT_SETUP limitations
From: |
Joel E. Denny |
Subject: |
Re: 2.62 AT_SETUP limitations |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:42:05 -0400 (EDT) |
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Eric Blake wrote:
> Eric Blake <ebb9 <at> byu.net> writes:
>
> > > I find it rarely pays to play the guessing game of "surely the user will
> > > never do *this*". Moreover, I'm betting that the user will never guess
> > > that this bizarre string is actually special to autotest.
> >
> > Magic line-noise strings don't just affect autotest, but all m4sugar-based
> > languages, including autoconf itself.
> >
> > > At the very
> > > least, can this new limitation be mentioned in the manual? Or did I miss
> > > it?
> >
> > So yes, it would probably be worth adding a blurb in the m4sugar
> documentation
>
> Like so:
Thanks for doing all this.
- Re: 2.62 AT_SETUP limitations, (continued)
Re: 2.62 AT_SETUP limitations, Noah Misch, 2008/04/22
- Re: 2.62 AT_SETUP limitations, Eric Blake, 2008/04/23
- Re: 2.62 AT_SETUP limitations, Eric Blake, 2008/04/23
- Re: 2.62 AT_SETUP limitations, Joel E. Denny, 2008/04/23
- Re: 2.62 AT_SETUP limitations, Eric Blake, 2008/04/23
- Re: 2.62 AT_SETUP limitations, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/24
- Re: 2.62 AT_SETUP limitations, Eric Blake, 2008/04/24
- Re: 2.62 AT_SETUP limitations,
Joel E. Denny <=
Re: 2.62 AT_SETUP limitations, Akim Demaille, 2008/04/24
tracing output [was: 2.62 AT_SETUP limitations], Eric Blake, 2008/04/24
Re: tracing output [was: 2.62 AT_SETUP limitations], Eric Blake, 2008/04/24
Re: tracing output, Akim Demaille, 2008/04/25
Re: 2.62 AT_SETUP limitations, Akim Demaille, 2008/04/24
Re: 2.62 AT_SETUP limitations, Joel E. Denny, 2008/04/24