[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: is ${!...} portable?
From: |
Mike Frysinger |
Subject: |
Re: is ${!...} portable? |
Date: |
Sun, 31 May 2009 03:10:36 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.11.3 (Linux/2.6.29.2; KDE/4.2.3; x86_64; ; ) |
On Sunday 31 May 2009 02:06:41 Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> Sometimes indirect expansion helps a lot in writing shell scripts. Is
> `${!foo}' portable or an invention of Bash?
it's specific to bash
> Perhaps it makes sense to mention this in the autoconf info file.
maybe, but where would you stop ? how much do you cover what is effectively
"bash extensions over POSIX" ? there's quite a bit there.
you can review the POSIX documentation here:
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.