bug-autoconf
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: is ${!...} portable?


From: Mike Frysinger
Subject: Re: is ${!...} portable?
Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 03:10:36 -0400
User-agent: KMail/1.11.3 (Linux/2.6.29.2; KDE/4.2.3; x86_64; ; )

On Sunday 31 May 2009 02:06:41 Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> Sometimes indirect expansion helps a lot in writing shell scripts.  Is
> `${!foo}' portable or an invention of Bash?

it's specific to bash

> Perhaps it makes sense to mention this in the autoconf info file.

maybe, but where would you stop ?  how much do you cover what is effectively 
"bash extensions over POSIX" ?  there's quite a bit there.

you can review the POSIX documentation here:
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]