[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Comment on introduction pages
From: |
Gary V. Vaughan |
Subject: |
Re: Comment on introduction pages |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Jun 2010 11:03:37 +0700 |
Hi Chris,
On 3 Jun 2010, at 21:01, Christina Gratorp wrote:
> I found a bug in the intro pages for automake:
> http://sources.redhat.com/automake/automake.html#Introduction. The sentence
> "The developer expresses the recipe to build *his* package in a Makefile"
> must be wrong since I'm a woman and a user and have packages I want to build
> and those packages are mine, i.e *hers* would be correct in this case.
>
> Suggestion: change the sentence to "The developer expresses the recipe to
> build *his/hers* package in a Makefile" or "The developer expresses the
> recipe to build *the* package in a Makefile"
But then it would be wrong for an even larger percentage of automake users,
almost none of which are hermaphrodites. At least with male pronouns we're
exactly right 90% of the time or so.
Cheers,
--
Gary V. Vaughan (address@hidden)
- Re: Comment on introduction pages, (continued)
- Re: Comment on introduction pages, Eric Blake, 2010/06/03
- Re: Comment on introduction pages, Mike Frysinger, 2010/06/04
- Re: Comment on introduction pages, Christina Gratorp, 2010/06/04
- Re: Comment on introduction pages, Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/06/04
- Re: Comment on introduction pages, Mike Frysinger, 2010/06/04
- Re: Comment on introduction pages, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/06/04
- Re: Comment on introduction pages, Christina Gratorp, 2010/06/05
- Re: Comment on introduction pages, Eric Blake, 2010/06/07
- Re: Comment on introduction pages, Stefano Lattarini, 2010/06/04
- Re: Comment on introduction pages, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2010/06/04
Re: Comment on introduction pages,
Gary V. Vaughan <=