[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Comment on introduction pages
From: |
Mike Frysinger |
Subject: |
Re: Comment on introduction pages |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Jun 2010 00:09:42 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.1 (Linux/2.6.34; KDE/4.4.3; x86_64; ; ) |
On Thursday, June 03, 2010 22:26:49 Eric Blake wrote:
> On 06/03/2010 06:28 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Eric Blake <address@hidden> writes:
> >> Thanks for the report. However, English is one of those silly languages
> >> where the pronoun "his" can have a neuter sense rather than masculine,
> >> and this is one of those cases. Politically correct pundits are trying
> >> to eradicate that usage, but personally, I'm still of the opinion that
> >> "his" looks better than "his/hers", as long as you understand that the
> >> usage is not locking down the gender of the antecedent.
> >
> > The long-standing gender-neutral pronoun in English is singular "their,"
> >
> > as used by such people as Jane Austen. I would rewrite the sentence as:
> > "The developer expresses the recipe to build their package in a
> > Makefile"
>
> A pedant would claim that it mixes singular and plural, but you are
> correct that it is in common enough usage that "their package" doesn't
> grate as badly on my nerves as "his/her package".
his/her is indeed garbage
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Comment on introduction pages, Christina Gratorp, 2010/06/03
- Re: Comment on introduction pages, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/06/04
- Re: Comment on introduction pages, Christina Gratorp, 2010/06/05
- Re: Comment on introduction pages, Eric Blake, 2010/06/07
- Re: Comment on introduction pages, Stefano Lattarini, 2010/06/04
- Re: Comment on introduction pages, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2010/06/04
Re: Comment on introduction pages, Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/06/04