[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: testsuite failure - 193 parallel execution
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: testsuite failure - 193 parallel execution |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:17:46 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100527 Thunderbird/3.0.5 |
On 07/20/10 14:11, Eric Blake wrote:
> Hmm, maybe we should do more validation in the parent - not just read
> from the fifo, but validate that we actually read a token. That way, we
> can ignore EOF (on the grounds that it may be a temporary condition, and
> that more children remain to be run) and only advance when the token we
> read back is non-empty.
That would be better than now, but taking a step back, why are we using
a named fifo at all? Why not simply use a pipe? Then we wouldn't have
to worry about all this after-you-Alphonse business. Children could
write to the pipe when they're done. The parent could read from the pipe
to find out when a child died.
- Re: testsuite failure - 193 parallel execution, (continued)
- Re: testsuite failure - 193 parallel execution, Paul Eggert, 2010/07/20
- Re: testsuite failure - 193 parallel execution, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/07/20
- Re: testsuite failure - 193 parallel execution, Eric Blake, 2010/07/20
- Re: testsuite failure - 193 parallel execution, Eric Blake, 2010/07/20
- Re: testsuite failure - 193 parallel execution, Paul Eggert, 2010/07/20
- Re: testsuite failure - 193 parallel execution, Paul Eggert, 2010/07/20
- Re: testsuite failure - 193 parallel execution, Eric Blake, 2010/07/20
- Re: testsuite failure - 193 parallel execution, Eric Blake, 2010/07/20
- Re: testsuite failure - 193 parallel execution, Eric Blake, 2010/07/20
- Re: testsuite failure - 193 parallel execution, Paul Eggert, 2010/07/20
- Re: testsuite failure - 193 parallel execution,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: testsuite failure - 193 parallel execution, Eric Blake, 2010/07/20
- Re: testsuite failure - 193 parallel execution, Paul Eggert, 2010/07/20
- Re: testsuite failure - 193 parallel execution, Eric Blake, 2010/07/20
- Re: testsuite failure - 193 parallel execution, Paul Eggert, 2010/07/20
- Re: testsuite failure - 193 parallel execution, Eric Blake, 2010/07/20
- Re: testsuite failure - 193 parallel execution, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/07/20
- Re: testsuite failure - 193 parallel execution, Eric Blake, 2010/07/20
- [PATCH] Avoid passing autotest job fds to test groups., Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/07/21
- Re: [PATCH] Avoid passing autotest job fds to test groups., Eric Blake, 2010/07/21
- Re: [PATCH] Avoid passing autotest job fds to test groups., Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/07/21