[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug in autoconf-2.64
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: bug in autoconf-2.64 |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Feb 2011 07:24:35 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-08-04) |
* Mike Stump wrote on Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:06:07AM CET:
> On Feb 23, 2011, at 1:37 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> > Are you on a machine with SSE4.2 instructions?
>
> Core 2 Duo. darwin10 (aka SnowLeopard). No glibc.
Here no SSE4.2 either. In an up to date build tree of the commit that
exposes the issue, I can turn the build failure into success if I preset
gl_cv_func_strstr_linear=yes gl_cv_func_strstr_works_always=yes
and I can flip between success and failure by editing config.status
like this: set REPLACE_STRSTR to 1, add strstr.lo to M4_LTLIBOBJS
(and strstr.o to M4_LIBOBJS), removing lib/string.h, rerunning
config.status and make.
IOW, it looks like the replacement code in strstr.c and str-two-way.h
has a bug (or glibc strchr, which seems rather unlikely). Besides
copyright year bumps, these two files have not been updated since in
gnulib.
Cheers,
Ralf
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, (continued)
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Mike Stump, 2011/02/22
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Eric Blake, 2011/02/22
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Mike Stump, 2011/02/22
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Eric Blake, 2011/02/22
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Mike Stump, 2011/02/22
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Peter O'Gorman, 2011/02/22
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Ralf Wildenhues, 2011/02/23
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Ralf Wildenhues, 2011/02/23
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Eric Blake, 2011/02/23
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Mike Stump, 2011/02/23
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Ralf Wildenhues, 2011/02/24
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Jim Meyering, 2011/02/24
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Jim Meyering, 2011/02/24
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Jim Meyering, 2011/02/24
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Jim Meyering, 2011/02/24
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Eric Blake, 2011/02/26
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Ralf Wildenhues, 2011/02/27