Re: Fwd: Getting AC_PROG_CC_C99

[Paul Eggert]

On 09/28/11 09:45, Bruno Haible wrote:
> If the package's configure.ac already invokes AC_PROG_CC_STDC,
> early on (i.e. usually right after AC_PROG_CC), then gnulib's
>   AC_REQUIRE([AC_PROG_CC_STDC])
> will be a no-op.

Ah, sorry, then we're fine as-is, since it's normal practice
to put the AC_PROG_CC_STDC before gl_EARLY.  And nobody uses
the corresponding C99 or C89 macros, as far as I know (if they
do, they should switch to AC_PROG_CC_STDC anyway :-).

Autoconf should be fixed too, of course, but that's a longer-term
project.