[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bash hash bug
|
From: |
Chet Ramey |
|
Subject: |
Re: bash hash bug |
|
Date: |
Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:49:23 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Macintosh/20061025) |
Linda Walsh wrote:
> Eric Blake wrote:
>> POSIX states, ...
>
>> It is too POSIX compliant
> ---
> I'm not running in POSIX compliant mode. I'd just appreciate
> hash working.
Turning off the `checkhash' option, which exists solely to implement the
Posix requirements, will result in hashing working the way you want.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
Live Strong. No day but today.
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU chet@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
- bash hash question (bug? misunderstanding?), Linda Walsh, 2006/11/19
- Re: bash hash question (bug? misunderstanding?), Chet Ramey, 2006/11/19
- Re: bash hash bug, Linda Walsh, 2006/11/19
- Re: bash hash bug, Eric Blake, 2006/11/19
- Re: bash hash bug, Eric Blake, 2006/11/19
- Re: bash hash bug, Linda Walsh, 2006/11/20
- Re: bash hash bug,
Chet Ramey <=
- Re: bash hash bug, Linda Walsh, 2006/11/20
- Re: bash hash bug, Chet Ramey, 2006/11/20
- Re: bash hash bug, Linda Walsh, 2006/11/20
- Re: bash hash bug, Bob Proulx, 2006/11/20
- Re: bash hash bug, Chet Ramey, 2006/11/21
- Re: bash hash bug, Eric Blake, 2006/11/24