Re: A few man page fixes from RHEL-5

[Matthew Woehlke]

Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
>
> > Doesn't 'exec' replace the process? I get the others (I think), but I
> > don't understand what shell is left to "stop execution" after an exec.
>
> exec can fail.

D'oh, fail to *do* anything... I was thinking if whatever was exec'd 
failed :-). Yes, that makes sense, of course.

--
Matthew
HIPPOS wallow slightly in the MUDDY RIVER
What do you want to do next?
> WALLOW IN MUDDY RIVER
You join HIPPOS.