[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Possible eval builtin speedup?
From: |
Chet Ramey |
Subject: |
Re: Possible eval builtin speedup? |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:33:30 -0400 |
> > > What is the role of xmbsrtowcs? Why doesn't mbsrtowcs convert 0x5c to
> > U<0x5c>?
> >
> >
> > I see. I assume that it's a bug in mbsrtowcs. (If you check, xmbsrtowcs
> > isn't used anywhere, so the question is moot.)
>
> Ok. But I suppose that the role of xdupmbsrtowcs is to avoid the same
> bug, am I right? So why isn't the bug corrected in mbsrtowcs?
No. xdupmbsrtowcs has a different calling convention and different behavior
entirely.
As for correcting mbsrtowcs, I have no access to the C libraries on all the
systems bash runs on. In some cases, I ship replacements; in other cases,
duplicate functions with slightly different names.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
Live Strong.
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.tis.case.edu/~chet/
- Re: Possible eval builtin speedup?, (continued)
- Re: Possible eval builtin speedup?, Nicolas Bonifas, 2008/03/06
- Message not available
- Re: Possible eval builtin speedup?, Jan Schampera, 2008/03/07
- Re: Possible eval builtin speedup?, Nicolas Bonifas, 2008/03/07
- Message not available
- Re: Possible eval builtin speedup?, Jan Schampera, 2008/03/07
- Re: Possible eval builtin speedup?, Nicolas, 2008/03/10
- Re: Possible eval builtin speedup?, Chet Ramey, 2008/03/10
- Re: Possible eval builtin speedup?, Nicolas, 2008/03/10
- Re: Possible eval builtin speedup?, Andreas Schwab, 2008/03/10
- Re: Possible eval builtin speedup?, Chet Ramey, 2008/03/10
- Re: Possible eval builtin speedup?, Nicolas, 2008/03/12
- Re: Possible eval builtin speedup?,
Chet Ramey <=