[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang
From: |
Chet Ramey |
Subject: |
Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:42:56 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421) |
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
No idea about that. GNU project folks are well-known for deprecating man
pages.
I didn't. The man page and info manual are equally authoritative.
Send reports of mistakes or discrepancies to me.
In this case, as I said, the info manual contains the same text.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU chet@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
- Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang, (continued)
- Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang, Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 2008/07/20
- Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang, Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 2008/07/22
- Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang, pk, 2008/07/22
- Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang, Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 2008/07/23
- Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang, pk, 2008/07/23
- Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang, Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 2008/07/23
- Re: inconsistent treatment of backslash-bang, Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 2008/07/27