[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fwd: Re: [uml-user] wondering about the output of time command (real/use
From: |
Toralf Förster |
Subject: |
Fwd: Re: [uml-user] wondering about the output of time command (real/user) |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Aug 2008 19:51:58 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
Hello,
I'm wondering whether it is an issue (pls see below) with the built-in command
"time" of my bash (version is 3.2.33(1)-release) or of the liux kernel itself.
---------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht ----------
Subject: Re: [uml-user] wondering about the output of time command (real/user)
Date: Monday 04 August 2008 19:00:35 :
From: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
To: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de>
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 06:11:48PM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote:
> Hhm,
>
> running the same command both at the host :
>
> n22 ~ # time factor 819734028463158891
> 819734028463158891: 3 273244676154386297
>
> real 0m6.002s
> user 0m5.911s
> sys 0m0.000s
>
> and within UML image :
>
> n22_uml ~ # time factor 819734028463158891
> 819734028463158891: 3 273244676154386297
>
> real 0m6.084s
> user 0m3.010s
> sys 0m0.000s
>
> I'm wondering why the same command at the same system needs within
> UML only half of the time as for the user part.
Looks like userspace ticks aren't being counted correctly...
That got trickier with the introduction of NOHZ.
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-------------------------------------------------------
--
MfG/Sincerely
Toralf Förster
pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7DB6 9DA3
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Fwd: Re: [uml-user] wondering about the output of time command (real/user),
Toralf Förster <=