bug-bash
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bash cores if nscd disabled on Solaris LDAP sasl/gssapi client


From: Serge Dussud
Subject: Re: bash cores if nscd disabled on Solaris LDAP sasl/gssapi client
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:46:53 +0100
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080807)


Hi Chet,

there've been follow-up discussions and reviews here with our linker folks (see [1] for some details on the bug that was open to capture those) and consensus is that best approach is to not compile with bash's own malloc routines. Indeed, ld(1)'s -z interpose option is a rather big hammer, as it establishes that the application can interpose on *all* of the symbols that it offers, rather than just the few related to malloc.

Hence, my question to you is: are there any real benefit these days of using bash's own malloc function rather than the one from the system ? or, otherwise said, what do bash lose when it's compiled with option --without-bash-malloc ?

TIA,
Serge



[1] http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6778453

On 10/30/08 08:26 PM, Chet Ramey wrote:
ah OK, so I guess I need to work on a customized patched for 3.2 then.
Any ideas yet of what the exact change will be in configure.bin so that I can apply to same in our deliveries ?

*** ../bash-3.2-patched/configure.in    2007-12-14 21:12:29.000000000 -0500
--- configure.in        2008-10-23 09:10:57.000000000 -0400
***************
*** 992,997 ****
--- 1009,1017 ----
  sco3.2*)      LOCAL_CFLAGS=-DMUST_UNBLOCK_CHLD ;;
  sunos4*)      LOCAL_CFLAGS=-DSunOS4 ;;
  solaris2.5*)  LOCAL_CFLAGS="-DSunOS5 -DSOLARIS" ;;
+ solaris2.8*)  LOCAL_CFLAGS=-DSOLARIS LOCAL_LDFLAGS='-z interpose' ;;
+ solaris2.9*)  LOCAL_CFLAGS=-DSOLARIS LOCAL_LDFLAGS='-z interpose' ;;
+ solaris2.10*) LOCAL_CFLAGS=-DSOLARIS LOCAL_LDFLAGS='-z interpose' ;;
  solaris2*)    LOCAL_CFLAGS=-DSOLARIS ;;
  lynxos*)      LOCAL_CFLAGS=-DRECYCLES_PIDS ;;
  linux*)               LOCAL_LDFLAGS=-rdynamic          # allow dynamic loading

Also, do you or would you have a bug # for reference ?

Sorry, I don't.

Chet





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]