[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bash-4.0 regression: negative return values
From: |
Mike Frysinger |
Subject: |
Re: bash-4.0 regression: negative return values |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:40:40 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.11.0 (Linux/2.6.28; KDE/4.2.0; x86_64; ; ) |
On Monday 23 February 2009 07:50:30 Eric Blake wrote:
> According to Mike Frysinger on 2/22/2009 10:03 PM:
> > previous versions of bash would happily accept negative values ( treated
> > as a signed integer and masked with like 0xff), but it seems some changes
> > related to option parsing has broken that
> >
> > $ f(){ return -1; }; f
> > -bash: return: -1: invalid option
> > return: usage: return [n]
>
> What about 'return -- -1'?
that does indeed work. thanks for pointing out the obvious which i missed ;).
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- bash-4.0 regression: negative return values, Mike Frysinger, 2009/02/23
- Re: bash-4.0 regression: negative return values, Jon Seymour, 2009/02/23
- Re: bash-4.0 regression: negative return values, Eric Blake, 2009/02/23
- Re: bash-4.0 regression: negative return values,
Mike Frysinger <=
- Re: bash-4.0 regression: negative return values, Chet Ramey, 2009/02/23
- Re: bash-4.0 regression: negative return values, Mike Frysinger, 2009/02/23
- Re: bash-4.0 regression: negative return values, Chet Ramey, 2009/02/23
- Re: bash-4.0 regression: negative return values, Mike Frysinger, 2009/02/23
- Re: bash-4.0 regression: negative return values, Chet Ramey, 2009/02/23
- Re: bash-4.0 regression: negative return values, Mike Frysinger, 2009/02/23
- Re: bash-4.0 regression: negative return values, Eric Blake, 2009/02/23