[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [OT] Re: how to start in "overwrite-mode"
From: |
Stephane CHAZELAS |
Subject: |
Re: [OT] Re: how to start in "overwrite-mode" |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:48:51 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-09-19) |
2009-10-28 11:06:09 -0400, Chris F.A. Johnson:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 02:00:53PM +0000, Stephane CHAZELAS wrote:
> > > I can understand it. I was more curious about the origins. After
> > > all, that breaks Bourne backward compatibility (in a shell
> > > called Bourne-again shell)
> >
> > Bourne shell has no functions at all.
>
> Had. Only before 1984. Since then it has had functions.
>
> The first shell I used, the Bourne shell on AT&T SVR3.2, had
> functions.
[...]
Yes,
The best place for information on the Bourne shell IMO is
http://www.in-ulm.de/~mascheck/bourne/index.html
Where we learn that Solaris (well SunOS at the time) sh has had
functions since SunOS 3, which according to
http://www.levenez.com/unix/ (another great site about Unix
history) takes us back to early 1986.
--
Stephane
- [OT] Re: how to start in "overwrite-mode", Stephane CHAZELAS, 2009/10/28
- Re: [OT] Re: how to start in "overwrite-mode", Chet Ramey, 2009/10/28
- Re: [OT] Re: how to start in "overwrite-mode", Stephane CHAZELAS, 2009/10/28
- Re: [OT] Re: how to start in "overwrite-mode", Chet Ramey, 2009/10/28
- Re: [OT] Re: how to start in "overwrite-mode", Stephane CHAZELAS, 2009/10/28
- Re: [OT] Re: how to start in "overwrite-mode", Greg Wooledge, 2009/10/28
- Re: [OT] Re: how to start in "overwrite-mode", Chris F.A. Johnson, 2009/10/28
- Re: [OT] Re: how to start in "overwrite-mode",
Stephane CHAZELAS <=
- Re: [OT] Re: how to start in "overwrite-mode", Chet Ramey, 2009/10/28
- Re: [OT] Re: how to start in "overwrite-mode", Marc Herbert, 2009/10/29