[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Return status of command substitution with $(...) "gets lost"
From: |
Chet Ramey |
Subject: |
Re: Return status of command substitution with $(...) "gets lost" |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:55:28 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
On 3/11/10 11:32 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> If you'd like 'local' to be standardized in the next version of POSIX,
> several years from now, that would also be a good goal; help in
> submitting the proposal to the Austin group would be appreciated.
I thought an early draft of Posix.2 (in those days) included a definition
of `local' and its behavior (d9, probably). I just can't lay my hands
on a copy right now.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU chet@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
- Return status of command substitution with $(...) "gets lost", Ettelbrueck, Heiko, 2010/03/04
- Re: Return status of command substitution with $(...) "gets lost", Chris F.A. Johnson, 2010/03/04
- Re: Return status of command substitution with $(...) "gets lost", Chet Ramey, 2010/03/04
- Re: Return status of command substitution with $(...) "gets lost", Marc Herbert, 2010/03/10
- Re: Return status of command substitution with $(...) "gets lost", Eric Blake, 2010/03/10
- Re: Return status of command substitution with $(...) "gets lost", Chet Ramey, 2010/03/10
- Message not available
- Re: Return status of command substitution with $(...) "gets lost", Chet Ramey, 2010/03/11
- Re: Return status of command substitution with $(...) "gets lost", Marc Herbert, 2010/03/11
- Re: Return status of command substitution with $(...) "gets lost", Eric Blake, 2010/03/11
- Re: Return status of command substitution with $(...) "gets lost",
Chet Ramey <=