[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: leading 0 inconsistence?
From: |
Ralf Goertz |
Subject: |
Re: leading 0 inconsistence? |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:12:38 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KNode/4.4.9 |
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 11:57:08AM +0100, Ralf Goertz wrote:
>> > if [ $((i)) -lt 9 ] ; then echo ok; fi
>> bash: 08: value too great for base (error token is "08")
>>
>> Why is 08 not tried to be interpreted as octal when *numerically* compared
>> using test?
>
> s/not // in your question, I assume.
Actually, I was surprised that the $i version worked. Since I read this
group regularly I knew that the $((i)) version wouldn't work and so no,
the "not " is correct ;)
> If your i variable is coming from a source that may or may not include
> leading zeroes (such as date(1)) then you have two choices:
It does come from date(1) and I was prepared to run into problems due to
octal interpretation. When I didn't I tried to force the problem with
$((i)) which then made me wonder…
Thank you and the other responders.