[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unexpected behavior with TZ
From: |
gmail |
Subject: |
Re: Unexpected behavior with TZ |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Apr 2011 00:16:58 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 |
Hello,
06/04/2011 15:18, Chet Ramey :
Hello,
While looking after the multibyte test, i notice a behavior with
printf3.sub that surprises me.
Apply the patches. Patch 5 addresses this.
Chet
I have applied the eight patches and the test works fine, sorry for the
noise.
I have studied a little the multibyte test and noticed that the locales
specified with the LANG environment variable are not considered by the
glibc's methods mblen and mbtowc (stdlib.h),
called from the method asciicode (buitlins/printf.def) when the LC_ALL
or LC_CTYPE environment variables are already set.
The multibyte test is successful on my host if i have first unset LC_ALL
and LC_CTYPE before running it.
I 'm not fully familiar with POSIX specifications regarding locales, for
now these specifications let me think that this behavior is expected and
that the
LANG environment variable is taken into account after the LC_*
environment variables. Therefore, perhaps this could be a way to deal
with this issue without (i hope) side effects on other archs :
--- tests/printf2.sub.orig 2009-02-24 20:12:32.000000000 +0100
+++ tests/printf2.sub 2011-04-07 23:21:24.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
export LANG=en_US.UTF-8
+unset LC_ALL
+unset LC_CTYPE
case $(printf %d\\n \'Ã) in
192) exit 0;;
On another point, the multibyte documentation on mblen and mbtowc
mentions that these two methods maintains an internal shift state
(probably a way to be able to operate with bytes streams).
I have noticed the DECLARE_MBSTATE macro in the asciicode method and
wonder if it is the way to guaranteed a clear initial state to the mblen
and mbtowc method.
As i see in the docs, a call to mbtowc(NULL, NULL, 0); resets the
internal state but this is an overhead that was not required regarding
the asciicode method ?
Regards, Cedric.
- Potential bug in library search for libiconv in static build, gmail, 2011/04/03
- Re: Potential bug in library search for libiconv in static build, Chet Ramey, 2011/04/04
- Re: Potential bug in library search for libiconv in static build, gmail, 2011/04/04
- Re: Potential bug in library search for libiconv in static build, gmail, 2011/04/05
- Re: Potential bug in library search for libiconv in static build, Chet Ramey, 2011/04/05
- Unexpected behavior with TZ, gmail, 2011/04/05
- Re: Unexpected behavior with TZ, Chet Ramey, 2011/04/06
- Re: Unexpected behavior with TZ,
gmail <=
- Re: Unexpected behavior with TZ, Marc Herbert, 2011/04/08
- Re: Unexpected behavior with TZ, Chet Ramey, 2011/04/08