[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: eval
From: |
Jonathan Nieder |
Subject: |
Re: eval |
Date: |
Wed, 4 May 2011 00:02:23 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Rafael Fernandez wrote:
> Thanks, I wasn't aware that positional parameters greater than nine have to
> be enclosed in brackets.
No prob. The manpage says
When a positional parameter consisting of more than a single
digit is expanded, it must be enclosed in braces (see
EXPANSION below).
If you have an idea for making this clearer (maybe somewhere in the
info documentation) I imagine it would be welcome.
For the future, the sh specification at
http://www.unix.org/2008edition/ (free registration required) is also
very useful for tracking down how a shell might understand a script.
- eval, Rafael Fernandez, 2011/05/05
- Re: eval, Jonathan Nieder, 2011/05/03
- Re: eval, DJ Mills, 2011/05/03
- Re: eval, Rafael Fernandez, 2011/05/05
- Re: eval,
Jonathan Nieder <=
- Re: eval, Andreas Schwab, 2011/05/04
- Re: eval, Rafael Fernandez, 2011/05/05
- Re: eval, Chet Ramey, 2011/05/05
- Re: eval, Eric Blake, 2011/05/05
- Re: eval, Chet Ramey, 2011/05/05
- Re: eval, Eric Blake, 2011/05/05
- Re: eval, Chet Ramey, 2011/05/05
- Re: eval, Sven Mascheck, 2011/05/05
- Re: eval, Chet Ramey, 2011/05/05
Re: eval, Greg Wooledge, 2011/05/04