[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Restricted Bash - Not so restrictive (in 4.2 as well)
|
From: |
Jonathan Nieder |
|
Subject: |
Re: Restricted Bash - Not so restrictive (in 4.2 as well) |
|
Date: |
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 05:43:25 -0600 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Sarnath K - ERS, HCLTech wrote:
> Apart from this, BASH Documentation says "When a command that is
> found to be a shell script is executed (see COMMAND EXECUTION
> above), rbash turns off any restrictions in the shell spawned to
> execute the script.".
>
> Does this mean that a guy with restricted shell can just write a
> shell script to do a privileged operation and get away with it?
"./my-custom-script" contains a "/".
- Restricted Bash - Not so restrictive (in 4.2 as well), Sarnath K - ERS, HCLTech, 2012/01/11
- Re: Restricted Bash - Not so restrictive (in 4.2 as well), Jonathan Nieder, 2012/01/11
- Re: Restricted Bash - Not so restrictive (in 4.2 as well), Chet Ramey, 2012/01/11
- RE: Restricted Bash - Not so restrictive (in 4.2 as well), Sarnath K - ERS, HCLTech, 2012/01/11
- Re: Restricted Bash - Not so restrictive (in 4.2 as well),
Jonathan Nieder <=
- RE: Restricted Bash - Not so restrictive (in 4.2 as well), Sarnath K - ERS, HCLTech, 2012/01/12
- Re: Restricted Bash - Not so restrictive (in 4.2 as well), Pierre Gaston, 2012/01/12
- RE: Restricted Bash - Not so restrictive (in 4.2 as well), Sarnath K - ERS, HCLTech, 2012/01/12
- Re: Restricted Bash - Not so restrictive (in 4.2 as well), Pierre Gaston, 2012/01/12
- RE: Restricted Bash - Not so restrictive (in 4.2 as well), Sarnath K - ERS, HCLTech, 2012/01/12