Re: Obsolete SIGRTMAX-n signal names

[Harald Hoyer]

On 04/24/2013 05:26 PM, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 4/23/13 2:05 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
>> As reported in http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?8025 , I would like to see the
>> SIGRTMAX-n signal names disappear.
>>
>> Signals should never ever be addressed with SIGRTMAX-n. Signals should 
>> always be
>> addressed with SIGRTMIN+n.
> 
> I'll take a look at this, but that's a pretty strong statement to make from
> something that appears in one Linux man page.  I can't find any shell in my
> quick testing that behaves as you propose.  Is there any other reason to do
> this?
> 
> Chet
> 
> 

Any progress, comments?