[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ast-users] Arithmetic assignment side-effects
From: |
Dan Douglas |
Subject: |
Re: [ast-users] Arithmetic assignment side-effects |
Date: |
Sat, 03 Aug 2013 17:41:13 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/4.10.5 (Linux/3.10.1-pf+; KDE/4.10.5; x86_64; ; ) |
On Sunday, August 04, 2013 12:30:48 AM Roland Mainz wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Dan Douglas <ormaaj@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Is it specified what the value of x should be after this expression?
> >
> > x=0; : $((x+=x=1))
> >
> > Bash, ksh93, mksh, posh say 1. zsh, dash, busybox say 2. Clang and gcc
> > both throw warnings about it, but both plus icc agree on 2.
>
> Just curious: Is that x86-specific or is the result always the same on
> other architectures, too ? Maybe there is something in ISO C1X/C99
> which actually defines or recommends a specific compiler behaviour.
> Maybe we should ask the "clang" people about the "why ?" ...
I've only tested x86 but my hunch would be it either requires/suggests 2, or
leaves it unspecified.
--
Dan Douglas
- Arithmetic assignment side-effects, Dan Douglas, 2013/08/03
- Re: [ast-users] Arithmetic assignment side-effects, Roland Mainz, 2013/08/03
- RE: [ast-users] Arithmetic assignment side-effects, Janis Papanagnou, 2013/08/03
- Re: Arithmetic assignment side-effects, Chris Down, 2013/08/04
- Re: Arithmetic assignment side-effects, Andreas Schwab, 2013/08/04
- Re: Arithmetic assignment side-effects, Chris Down, 2013/08/04
- Re: Arithmetic assignment side-effects, Linda Walsh, 2013/08/04
- Re: Arithmetic assignment side-effects, Dan Douglas, 2013/08/05
- Re: Arithmetic assignment side-effects, Linda Walsh, 2013/08/05
- Re: Arithmetic assignment side-effects, Andreas Schwab, 2013/08/05