[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bash built-ins `true' and `false' undocumented
From: |
Mike Frysinger |
Subject: |
Re: bash built-ins `true' and `false' undocumented |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Sep 2013 18:31:55 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.10.6; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) |
On Friday 27 September 2013 16:20:57 Chris Down wrote:
> On 2013-09-27 20:19, Roland Winkler wrote:
> > Yet I think that the info pages are supposed to provide the definitive
> > information about GNU software. So I still believe that it would be
> > useful to list these builtins in the info pages, too. Certainly,
> > the info pages are more useful for getting an overview. `help foo'
> > only helps if you already have some idea of what you are looking for.
>
> Well, they're directly part of the POSIX spec. I'm not sure there's a
> need to reiterate absolutely everything that is already required by
> POSIX.
on a GNU system, coreutils provides `true` and `false` as well as man & info
pages. i don't think having bash duplicate things would be useful in any way.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.