[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: REGRESSION: shellshock patch rejects valid function names
From: |
Greg Wooledge |
Subject: |
Re: REGRESSION: shellshock patch rejects valid function names |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Sep 2014 16:13:45 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 08:08:23PM +0000, Jay Freeman (saurik) wrote:
> Google's style guide for shell actually states that using :: in function
> names to separate library names from function names and package names within
> library names is their best practice.
My respect for Google just dropped. More.
- REGRESSION: shellshock patch rejects valid function names, Jay Freeman (saurik), 2014/09/26
- REGRESSION: shellshock patch rejects valid function names, Jay Freeman (saurik), 2014/09/26
- Re: REGRESSION: shellshock patch rejects valid function names, Jay Freeman (saurik), 2014/09/26
- Re: REGRESSION: shellshock patch rejects valid function names,
Greg Wooledge <=
- Re: REGRESSION: shellshock patch rejects valid function names, Eric Blake, 2014/09/26
- Re: REGRESSION: shellshock patch rejects valid function names, Ángel González, 2014/09/26
- Re: REGRESSION: shellshock patch rejects valid function names, Dan Douglas, 2014/09/26
- Re: REGRESSION: shellshock patch rejects valid function names, Chet Ramey, 2014/09/27
- Re: REGRESSION: shellshock patch rejects valid function names, Eric Blake, 2014/09/27
- Re: REGRESSION: shellshock patch rejects valid function names, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis, 2014/09/27
- Re: REGRESSION: shellshock patch rejects valid function names, Eric Blake, 2014/09/27
- Re: REGRESSION: shellshock patch rejects valid function names, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis, 2014/09/27
- Re: REGRESSION: shellshock patch rejects valid function names, Stephane Chazelas, 2014/09/29
- Re: REGRESSION: shellshock patch rejects valid function names, Chet Ramey, 2014/09/27