[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dynamic variable failure & equiv-const strings compare unequal
From: |
Oleg Popov |
Subject: |
Re: Dynamic variable failure & equiv-const strings compare unequal |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Oct 2015 15:40:09 +0300 |
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 05:13:45AM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote:
> Oleg Popov wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 03:01:06AM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote:
> >> [cut]
> >> I.e. test output was:
> >> Case 2 got/Expected:
> >> "222"
> >> "1\ 222\ .3\ .4"
> >> [cut]
> >
> > You didn't initialize the array. By the time you do "parts[1]=222" it's
> > still empty. And in your previous message you tried to initialize it in
> > a subshell. Variables don't retain their values after returning from
> > subshells.
> ----
> I was testing if dynamic scoping included subshells, I
> didn't think so, but that doesn't mean I don't test it. I removed
> it though, as it confused the example.
>
> ip and 'parts' are both initialized in global.
>
> testor calls (tst0, tst1, tst2 & tst3).
>
> tst0 & tst1 both call "assignparts" which uses the global
> value of $ip to set the global value of parts. I.e. since
> neither "ip" nor 'parts' are declared inside of any of the
> functions, they should use the top-level global values, no?
>
> tst2, using the last global value set in tst1, only tries to
> change 1 value in 'parts'... i.e. why would 'ip' reference the
> global value of 'ip', but not parts?
>
> ip and parts are declared at the same scope (global), so why
> wouldn't the global 'parts' be initialized as well?
$(...) is a subshell. Variables cannot be passed back from a subshell,
no matter how and where they are declared.
> > Bash uses unquoted characters on the right side of == and != as
> > wildcard patterns. For example, [ipaddr] in $exp means "any of i, p,
> > a, d, r". You should quote the right operand.
> ---
> Ahh... or if I quote both sides
> using 'printf "%q"' first, that should do the same, no?
No. Just use double quotes:
[[ $var1 == "$var2" ]]
> So, ok, I get that one -- but the first looks sketchy,
> as ip and parts are both, only defined at the global level,
> thus my expectation that just like it used the global value of
> 'ip' for tst0 & tsts1 -- it should have stored the split version
> of it in the global value of parts... I really don't get why
> it would use the global value as a dynamic in 1 case but not
> the other...?