[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hash-bang line length
|
From: |
Chet Ramey |
|
Subject: |
Re: Hash-bang line length |
|
Date: |
Wed, 13 Jan 2016 15:47:58 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 |
On 1/13/16 12:41 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>> but it prints a misleading error message with an even more truncated
>>> hash-bang line.
>>
>> Again, it's only a cosmetic issue. I don't have a problem with increasing
>> the buffer size, but let's not pretend it's anything but that.
>
> Exactly. I was talking about the “bad interpreter” error message
> specifically.
OK, we'll try it. Can't hurt.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU chet@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
Re: Hash-bang line length, Chet Ramey, 2016/01/13