Re: bug: illegal function name?

[Eduardo Bustamante]

On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 10:46 AM Andrey Butirsky <butirsky@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'm not quite understand what exactly is "intentional".

Accepting different sets of function names (when POSIX mode is either on/off).

> The problem is inconsistent behavior of unset '-f' flag for "normal" and
> "not-normal" function names (I'm not considering conflicting with
> variable names case).
> This is just confusing and makes the scripts error-prone, IMO.

How about this: "/Always/ use unset -f to unset functions". Also,
don't ignore the "variable names case", because that's an important
piece here.