[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug: illegal function name?
From: |
Andrey Butirsky |
Subject: |
Re: bug: illegal function name? |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Jan 2019 22:05:11 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:65.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/65.0 |
Eduardo, the question is about inconsistent, error-prone implementation.
Not about the workarounds.
On 20.01.2019 21:59, Eduardo Bustamante wrote:
>> The problem is inconsistent behavior of unset '-f' flag for "normal" and
>> "not-normal" function names (I'm not considering conflicting with
>> variable names case).
>> This is just confusing and makes the scripts error-prone, IMO.
> How about this: "/Always/ use unset -f to unset functions". Also,
> don't ignore the "variable names case", because that's an important
> piece here.
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, (continued)
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Ilkka Virta, 2019/01/20
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Chet Ramey, 2019/01/20
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Eduardo A . Bustamante López, 2019/01/20
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Andrey Butirsky, 2019/01/20
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Eduardo Bustamante, 2019/01/20
- Re: bug: illegal function name?,
Andrey Butirsky <=
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Eduardo Bustamante, 2019/01/20
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Chet Ramey, 2019/01/20
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Andrey Butirsky, 2019/01/20
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Robert Elz, 2019/01/20
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Eduardo A . Bustamante López, 2019/01/20
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, pepa65, 2019/01/21
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Chet Ramey, 2019/01/21
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Robert Elz, 2019/01/20
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Andrey Butirsky, 2019/01/21
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Chet Ramey, 2019/01/20