[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug: illegal function name?
|
From: |
Eduardo Bustamante |
|
Subject: |
Re: bug: illegal function name? |
|
Date: |
Sun, 20 Jan 2019 11:08:59 -0800 |
On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 11:05 AM Andrey Butirsky <butirsky@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Eduardo, the question is about inconsistent, error-prone implementation.
> Not about the workarounds.
What's the error prone part?
- Declare a function name
- Unset it with 'unset -f'
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, (continued)
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Ilkka Virta, 2019/01/20
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Chet Ramey, 2019/01/20
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Eduardo A . Bustamante López, 2019/01/20
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Andrey Butirsky, 2019/01/20
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Eduardo Bustamante, 2019/01/20
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Andrey Butirsky, 2019/01/20
- Re: bug: illegal function name?,
Eduardo Bustamante <=
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Chet Ramey, 2019/01/20
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Andrey Butirsky, 2019/01/20
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Robert Elz, 2019/01/20
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Eduardo A . Bustamante López, 2019/01/20
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, pepa65, 2019/01/21
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Chet Ramey, 2019/01/21
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Robert Elz, 2019/01/20
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Andrey Butirsky, 2019/01/21
- Re: bug: illegal function name?, Chet Ramey, 2019/01/20