[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: make install failed; dump core in mkdir
From: |
Eli Schwartz |
Subject: |
Re: make install failed; dump core in mkdir |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Dec 2019 10:06:36 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 |
On 12/2/19 9:56 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 09:51:12PM +0700, pepa65 wrote:
>> On 12/2/19 9:38 PM, Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri wrote:> for dirpath do
>>> command mkdir -p "$dirpath" || return
>>> done
>> It is very sad that the 'do' is not optional (non-backwards compatibility
>> breaking feature request!), and it has to be the start of the next
>> commandline (after ';' or the start of a new line), so:
>>
>> for dirpath
>> do command mkdir -p "$dirpath" || return
>> done
>
> You're mistaken.
>
> wooledg:~$ set -- a b c
> wooledg:~$ for i do echo "$i"; done
> a
> b
> c
Interesting, I didn't expect that to work. It doesn't work if you use
'in', which I normally do.
$ for i in "$@" do echo "$i"; done
bash: syntax error near unexpected token `done'
I guess that makes sense -- the 'in' will try to treat the words "do"
"echo" "$i" as iteration elements, but without 'in', there can only be
one argument to 'for', so bash can safely parse 'do' without the ;
separator.
But I think I'll still use them despite being not strictly needed, or
I'll just confuse myself once I do need them. :p I've used them for too
long by now, anyway.
--
Eli Schwartz
Arch Linux Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: make install failed; dump core in mkdir, Chet Ramey, 2019/12/02