[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [EXT] Re: Bash 5.1: rl_readline_version = 0x801 (shouldn't it be 0x0
From: |
Greg Wooledge |
Subject: |
Re: [EXT] Re: Bash 5.1: rl_readline_version = 0x801 (shouldn't it be 0x0801 ?) |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Dec 2020 07:40:25 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 09:47:05AM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Dez 07 2020, Testing Purposes wrote:
>
> > From an integer standpoint, I know that 08 (with one leading zero) is the
> > same as 8.
>
> Nope, it is a syntax error.
In a bash math context or in C, 08 is indeed a syntax error, as it is
an octal integer constant with an invalid digit ("8").
In mathematics, 08 is just 8.
- Bash 5.1: rl_readline_version = 0x801 (shouldn't it be 0x0801 ?), Testing Purposes, 2020/12/07
- Re: Bash 5.1: rl_readline_version = 0x801 (shouldn't it be 0x0801 ?), Testing Purposes, 2020/12/08
- Re: Bash 5.1: rl_readline_version = 0x801 (shouldn't it be 0x0801 ?), Lawrence Velázquez, 2020/12/08
- Re: Bash 5.1: rl_readline_version = 0x801 (shouldn't it be 0x0801 ?), Testing Purposes, 2020/12/08
- Re: Bash 5.1: rl_readline_version = 0x801 (shouldn't it be 0x0801 ?), Chet Ramey, 2020/12/08
- Re: Bash 5.1: rl_readline_version = 0x801 (shouldn't it be 0x0801 ?), Testing Purposes, 2020/12/09
- Re: Bash 5.1: rl_readline_version = 0x801 (shouldn't it be 0x0801 ?), Chet Ramey, 2020/12/09