Re: Arithmetic expression: recursive VAR evaluation suppresses desired VAR assignment

[Steffen Nurpmeso]

Robert Elz wrote in
 <16667.1660234219@jacaranda.noi.kre.to>:
 |    Date:        Thu, 11 Aug 2022 16:22:12 +0200
 |    From:        Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen@sdaoden.eu>
 |    Message-ID:  <20220811142212.JhlPJ%steffen@sdaoden.eu>
 |
 |
 |||> Hm.  Well i agree that precedence rules which loose a construct
 |||> completely (in that =5 is lost in I=5?I:J) is weird, but other
 |
 |I seem to have lost/missed whatever message that was originally in, but
 |nothing is lost there
 |
 | I=5?I:J
 |is
 | I = ( 5 > I : J )
 |
 |and since 5 is true, that amounts to
 |
 | I = I
 |
 |There's nothing weird about that at all, no more than
 |
 | 3+2 * 7
 |
 |giving 17, rather than 35 is weird.   Precedence matters.

Yes.  Confusion.  Nothing but confusion.  And not waiting for
settlement.

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,                The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter           he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)