[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Bash-5.2 patch 14
From: |
Chet Ramey |
Subject: |
Bash-5.2 patch 14 |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Dec 2022 09:41:25 -0500 |
BASH PATCH REPORT
=================
Bash-Release: 5.2
Patch-ID: bash52-014
Bug-Reported-by: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Bug-Reference-ID: <mvmv8opcbha.fsf@suse.de>
Bug-Reference-URL:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2022-10/msg00076.html
Bug-Description:
Bash defers processing additional terminating signals when running the
EXIT trap while exiting due to a terminating signal. This patch allows the
new terminating signal to kill the shell immediately.
Patch (apply with `patch -p0'):
*** ../bash-5.2-patched/execute_cmd.c 2022-11-23 17:09:18.000000000 -0500
--- execute_cmd.c 2022-11-28 10:36:08.000000000 -0500
***************
*** 3625,3628 ****
--- 3649,3653 ----
dispose_words (es);
+ QUIT;
if (match)
*** ../bash-5.2-patched/sig.c 2021-11-04 14:15:31.000000000 -0400
--- sig.c 2022-12-06 09:45:11.000000000 -0500
***************
*** 95,98 ****
--- 95,99 ----
static void initialize_shell_signals PARAMS((void));
+ static void kill_shell PARAMS((int));
void
***************
*** 487,490 ****
--- 495,500 ----
}
+ static int handling_termsig = 0;
+
sighandler
termsig_sighandler (sig)
***************
*** 533,536 ****
--- 543,554 ----
terminate_immediately = 1;
+ /* If we are currently handling a terminating signal, we have a couple of
+ choices here. We can ignore this second terminating signal and let the
+ shell exit from the first one, or we can exit immediately by killing
+ the shell with this signal. This code implements the latter; to implement
+ the former, replace the kill_shell(sig) with return. */
+ if (handling_termsig)
+ kill_shell (sig); /* just short-circuit now */
+
terminating_signal = sig;
***************
*** 565,572 ****
int sig;
{
- static int handling_termsig = 0;
- int i, core;
- sigset_t mask;
-
/* Simple semaphore to keep this function from being executed multiple
times. Since we no longer are running as a signal handler, we don't
--- 585,588 ----
***************
*** 574,578 ****
if (handling_termsig)
return;
! handling_termsig = 1;
terminating_signal = 0; /* keep macro from re-testing true. */
--- 590,595 ----
if (handling_termsig)
return;
!
! handling_termsig = terminating_signal; /* for termsig_sighandler */
terminating_signal = 0; /* keep macro from re-testing true. */
***************
*** 614,617 ****
--- 631,644 ----
run_exit_trap (); /* XXX - run exit trap possibly in signal context? */
+ kill_shell (sig);
+ }
+
+ static void
+ kill_shell (sig)
+ int sig;
+ {
+ int i, core;
+ sigset_t mask;
+
/* We don't change the set of blocked signals. If a user starts the shell
with a terminating signal blocked, we won't get here (and if by some
*** ../bash-5.2/patchlevel.h 2020-06-22 14:51:03.000000000 -0400
--- patchlevel.h 2020-10-01 11:01:28.000000000 -0400
***************
*** 26,30 ****
looks for to find the patch level (for the sccs version string). */
! #define PATCHLEVEL 13
#endif /* _PATCHLEVEL_H_ */
--- 26,30 ----
looks for to find the patch level (for the sccs version string). */
! #define PATCHLEVEL 14
#endif /* _PATCHLEVEL_H_ */
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Bash-5.2 patch 14,
Chet Ramey <=