Re: Arithmetic expression: evaluation order bug

[Robert Elz]

    Date:        Fri, 30 Dec 2022 16:48:15 +0100
    From:        Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen@sdaoden.eu>
    Message-ID:  <20221230154815.7-TQs%steffen@sdaoden.eu>


  | Of course i continue to disagree as i continue to
  | disagree on much of the sequence point outcome of ISO C, too.

There's a big difference between not liking much of what WG14 (the
C standards group) do, and disputing that an implementation which
does what they permit is valid.

There's much (very much) about what WG14 does that I don't like, but
that's neither here nor there when we're considering what user code
should look like, and what implementations are permitted to do.

Still, the rules are as they are - if you want to change them, moaning
about it here won't help in the slightest.

kre