Re: IFS field splitting doesn't conform with POSIX

[Felipe Contreras]

On Sat, Apr 1, 2023 at 6:35 PM Lawrence Velázquez <vq@larryv.me> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 1, 2023, at 8:02 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > In that example they are discussing whether or not to make that
> > behavior a *requirement*. That is prescriptive.
>
> You're so busy pretending this is debate club that you're completely
> missing everyone's point, which is that the Austin Group by and
> large aims to standardize existing behavior.

I did not miss your point, you are missing mine, which you are clearly
not interested in listening to.

Fortunately kre did listen.

Cheers.

-- 
Felipe Contreras