[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/990] "nm -l" doesn't work well on relocatable files
From: |
qunyingpan at yahoo dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug ld/990] "nm -l" doesn't work well on relocatable files |
Date: |
6 Jun 2005 16:50:29 -0000 |
------- Additional Comments From qunyingpan at yahoo dot com 2005-06-06 16:50
-------
Subject: Re: "nm -l" doesn't work well on relocatable files
George, so you are debugging an executable (vmlinux),
not a relocatable file when you see this problem,
right?
The problem reported here and the patch is fixing is
only for a relocatable object, not an executable. Is
it correct? Lu?
Thanks,
--- george at mvista dot com
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
> ------- Additional Comments From george at mvista
> dot com 2005-06-06 15:59 -------
> Subject: Re: "nm -l" doesn't work well on
> relocatable files
>
> hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
> > ------- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot
> org 2005-06-06 14:56 -------
> > I checked in my patch. I will have a followup
> patch later.
> >
> > nm and gdb may or may not share that piece of
> code. You need to file a gdb
> > bug report.
>
> The problem is knowing where the info gets lost. My
> initial study seemed to
> indicate that it was ld that was doing it, thus this
> report.
>
> >
> > BTW, does entry.S have dwarf debug info? does gdb
> get wrong line number on
> > functions or just variables?
>
> Yes, I use -gdwarf-2. The wrong info shows up on
> "bt" into entry.S where gdb
> (run in emacs) shows the source file. What is
> displayed, ususlly, is some
> header file. This is line number/source related.
> The reported function is the
> nearest preceeding label and seems to be right.
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=990
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching
> someone who is.
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=990
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- [Bug ld/990] New: debug symbols error, qunyingpan at yahoo dot com, 2005/06/02
- [Bug ld/990] "nm -l" doesn't work well on data symbols in relocatable files, hjl at lucon dot org, 2005/06/04
- [Bug ld/990] "nm -l" doesn't work well on relocatable files, hjl at lucon dot org, 2005/06/04
- [Bug ld/990] "nm -l" doesn't work well on relocatable files, hjl at lucon dot org, 2005/06/05
- [Bug ld/990] "nm -l" doesn't work well on relocatable files, hjl at lucon dot org, 2005/06/05
- [Bug ld/990] "nm -l" doesn't work well on relocatable files, george at mvista dot com, 2005/06/06
- [Bug ld/990] "nm -l" doesn't work well on relocatable files, hjl at lucon dot org, 2005/06/06
- [Bug ld/990] "nm -l" doesn't work well on relocatable files, george at mvista dot com, 2005/06/06
- [Bug ld/990] "nm -l" doesn't work well on relocatable files,
qunyingpan at yahoo dot com <=
- [Bug ld/990] "nm -l" doesn't work well on relocatable files, george at mvista dot com, 2005/06/06
- [Bug ld/990] "nm -l" doesn't work well on relocatable files, hjl at lucon dot org, 2005/06/06