[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BUG elf32-i386 R_386_PC32 done wrong
From: |
doctor electron |
Subject: |
Re: BUG elf32-i386 R_386_PC32 done wrong |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Jun 2006 19:45:38 -0500 |
Long, long ago, Ian Lance Taylor, a life form in far off space,
emitted:
>the four bytes affected by R_386_PC32
Dear Ian, I think a single statement edit would fix ld re rel
relocs: The place where we read the "four bytes affected" now
is the equivalent of
x = [the four bytes] ...or... mov eax,[esi]
We need to change that one statement to the equivalent of
x = -4 ...or... mov eax,-4
Would you be so kind as to inform us of the file/line number of
that statement? If so, we'll recompile (I have a friend who can
do that) and test the fixed ld on both my and existing object
files. TIA, Jim
- Re: BUG elf32-i386 R_386_PC32 done wrong, (continued)
- Re: BUG elf32-i386 R_386_PC32 done wrong, Ian Lance Taylor, 2006/06/24
- Re: BUG elf32-i386 R_386_PC32 done wrong, Airr, 2006/06/25
- Re: BUG elf32-i386 R_386_PC32 done wrong, Ian Lance Taylor, 2006/06/25
- Re: BUG elf32-i386 R_386_PC32 done wrong, doctor electron, 2006/06/25
- Re: BUG elf32-i386 R_386_PC32 done wrong, doctor electron, 2006/06/25
- Re: BUG elf32-i386 R_386_PC32 done wrong, Ian Lance Taylor, 2006/06/25
- Re: BUG elf32-i386 R_386_PC32 done wrong, doctor electron, 2006/06/25
- Re: BUG elf32-i386 R_386_PC32 done wrong, Ian Lance Taylor, 2006/06/26
Re: BUG elf32-i386 R_386_PC32 done wrong,
doctor electron <=