bug-binutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug gas/5457] INTOUCH instruction incorrectly disassembled.


From: Jonathan S. Shapiro
Subject: Re: [Bug gas/5457] INTOUCH instruction incorrectly disassembled.
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 13:13:40 -0500

On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 17:13 +0000, nickc at redhat dot com wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com  2007-12-21 17:13 
> -------
> I think that you may need to define a new opcode operator, one like 'c' but
> which only accepts 'ic','dc' or 'bc' and then use this.

> PS. Incidentally it would be great if you could include a new gas testsuite 
> test
> in any future patch which would check to make sure that the syntax is parsed 
> and
> disassembled correctly....

It certainly would, but as I explained early on, I don't quite know how
to do this. I'll try to use some existing test case as a model and see
what I can do.

Meanwhile, support for coldfire in GDB looks pretty borked too. Before I
go duplicating effort, does anybody know who is maintaining GDB and
binutils coldfire?

I will ask on the GDB list as well.


shap





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]