[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/6519] __start_SECNAME undocumented
From: |
nickc at redhat dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug ld/6519] __start_SECNAME undocumented |
Date: |
21 May 2008 12:10:51 -0000 |
------- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2008-05-21 12:10
-------
Subject: Re: __start_SECNAME undocumented
Hi Daniel,
> Meanwhile, for this bug. I'm not sure about editing the NEWS entry since the
> current behavior may be more recent than 2.6. But the manual change looks
> perfect to me.
Tell you what - I'll check in the change to the manual as-is and add an
addendum to the NEWS entry describing how the feature is now
implemented, in case other people read that far back in the NEWS file.
Cheers
Nick
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6519
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- [Bug ld/6519] New: __start_SECNAME undocumented, drow at sources dot redhat dot com, 2008/05/14
- [Bug ld/6519] __start_SECNAME undocumented, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/05/21
- [Bug ld/6519] __start_SECNAME undocumented, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/05/21
- [Bug ld/6519] __start_SECNAME undocumented, drow at sources dot redhat dot com, 2008/05/21
- [Bug ld/6519] __start_SECNAME undocumented,
nickc at redhat dot com <=
- [Bug ld/6519] __start_SECNAME undocumented, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/05/21
- [Bug ld/6519] __start_SECNAME undocumented, drow at sources dot redhat dot com, 2008/05/21