[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/6945] ld -r severely broken on 64-bit mingw / pe-x86-64
From: |
nickc at redhat dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug ld/6945] ld -r severely broken on 64-bit mingw / pe-x86-64 |
Date: |
9 Oct 2008 13:23:27 -0000 |
------- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2008-10-09 13:23
-------
Hi Mikael,
So - what is the difference between bug.o and bug2.o ?
Is it possible to reproduce the bug without using inline assembly ?
Cheers
Nick
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6945
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- [Bug ld/6945] New: ld -r severely broken on 64-bit mingw / pe-x86-64, mikpe at it dot uu dot se, 2008/10/06
- [Bug ld/6945] ld -r severely broken on 64-bit mingw / pe-x86-64,
nickc at redhat dot com <=
- [Bug ld/6945] ld -r severely broken on 64-bit mingw / pe-x86-64, mikpe at it dot uu dot se, 2008/10/09
- [Bug ld/6945] ld -r severely broken on 64-bit mingw / pe-x86-64, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/10/22
- [Bug ld/6945] ld -r severely broken on 64-bit mingw / pe-x86-64, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/10/22
- [Bug ld/6945] ld -r severely broken on 64-bit mingw / pe-x86-64, mikpe at it dot uu dot se, 2008/10/25
- [Bug ld/6945] ld -r severely broken on 64-bit mingw / pe-x86-64, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/10/25