Re: [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to

bug-binutils

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to

From:	Nick Clifton
Subject:	Re: [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols
Date:	Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:26:42 +0100
User-agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080723)

Hi Kirill,

This change provokes text relocations.


Sorry - please could you explain what that means and why it is undesirable ?

I guess, PIC version of libiberty.a should be used.

A PIC version of libiberty is not normally generated even if configurewith --enable-shared...


Cheers
  Nick

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

[Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, (continued)
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, ps dot m at gmx dot net, 2008/10/03
  - Re: [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, Nick Clifton, 2008/10/04
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/10/04
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, ps dot m at gmx dot net, 2008/10/07
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/10/09
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/10/09
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, ps dot m at gmx dot net, 2008/10/10
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/10/10
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, kirill at shutemov dot name, 2008/10/13
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, kirill at shutemov dot name, 2008/10/13
  - Re: [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, Nick Clifton <=
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/10/13
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, kirill at shutemov dot name, 2008/10/13
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, ldv at altlinux dot org, 2008/10/13
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, ldv at altlinux dot org, 2008/10/13
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, amodra at bigpond dot net dot au, 2008/10/13
  - Re: [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, Nick Clifton, 2008/10/14
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/10/14
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com, 2008/10/14
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/10/22
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, ps dot m at gmx dot net, 2008/10/22

Prev by Date: Re: Can't run "install-strip" in binutils 2.18 ... ?
Next by Date: [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols
Previous by thread: [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols
Next by thread: [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread