[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/11549] Allow 32bit relocations in 64bit code
From: |
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/11549] Allow 32bit relocations in 64bit code |
Date: |
5 May 2010 15:59:54 -0000 |
------- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-05-05
15:59 -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> > You should checkout how other x86-64 low-level loaders deal with it.
>
> They just don't have cross 32/64 bit relocations. In our case we badly need
> them
> :(
What you are trying to do violates x86-64 psABI and it isn't supported
by the x86-64 linker. You have 2 choices:
1. Use a private linker with your changes.
2. Propose a new linker switch to support x86-64 binaries loaded at
virtual addresses lower then 4GB.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11549
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- [Bug binutils/11549] Allow 32bit relocations in 64bit code, dev at sw dot ru, 2010/05/05
- [Bug binutils/11549] Allow 32bit relocations in 64bit code, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com, 2010/05/05
- [Bug binutils/11549] Allow 32bit relocations in 64bit code, dev at sw dot ru, 2010/05/05
- [Bug binutils/11549] Allow 32bit relocations in 64bit code, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com, 2010/05/05
- [Bug binutils/11549] Allow 32bit relocations in 64bit code, dev at sw dot ru, 2010/05/05
- [Bug binutils/11549] Allow 32bit relocations in 64bit code,
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com <=
- [Bug binutils/11549] Allow 32bit relocations in 64bit code, dev at sw dot ru, 2010/05/06
- [Bug binutils/11549] Allow 32bit relocations in 64bit code, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com, 2010/05/06