bug-binutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug binutils/11843] ld long link times due to compute_bucket_count() ch


From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
Subject: [Bug binutils/11843] ld long link times due to compute_bucket_count() choosing hash table size
Date: 30 Jul 2010 23:11:01 -0000

------- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2010-07-30 
23:11 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > Here is a conservative patch.
> > 
> > Index: bfd/elflink.c
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/elflink.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.372
> > diff -u -r1.372 elflink.c
> > --- bfd/elflink.c       14 Apr 2010 08:29:33 -0000      1.372
> > +++ bfd/elflink.c       28 Jul 2010 22:21:53 -0000
> > @@ -5374,6 +5374,7 @@
> >        const struct elf_backend_data *bed = get_elf_backend_data (dynobj);
> >        unsigned long int *counts;
> >        bfd_size_type amt;
> > +      unsigned int no_improvement_count = 0;
> >  
> >        /* Possible optimization parameters: if we have NSYMS symbols we say
> >          that the hashing table must at least have NSYMS/4 and at most
> > @@ -5458,7 +5459,10 @@
> >             {
> >               best_chlen = max;
> >               best_size = i;
> > +              no_improvement_count = 0;
> >             }
> > +          else if (++no_improvement_count == 100)
> > +            break;
> >         }
> >  
> >        free (counts);
> > 
> 
> It looks good to me. Please post it to binutils mailing list. Thanks.

My second though. This patch gives up way too early.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11843

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]