bug-binutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug ld/13561] AIX link failure: RLD address not contained in sectio


From: Tristan Gingold
Subject: Re: [Bug ld/13561] AIX link failure: RLD address not contained in section
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 09:23:09 +0100

On Jan 5, 2012, at 9:11 AM, ka5427-536 at online dot de wrote:

> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13561
> 
> --- Comment #1 from ka5427-536 at online dot de 2012-01-05 08:11:26 UTC ---
> address@hidden> nm -C partial.o
> 
>  00000148 T .bar()
>  00000000 T .foo()
>  00000078 W .std::auto_ptr<int>::auto_ptr(int*)
>  000000d8 W .std::auto_ptr<int>::~auto_ptr()
>           U .operator delete(void*)
>           U .operator new(unsigned long)
>  100002f0 d .data
>  100002a0 d .data
>  00000148 t .text
>  00000000 t .text
>  1000037c d TOC
>  100002f0 D _GLOBAL__F_bar.cpp_9A43FB88_F8600D79
>  100002a0 D _GLOBAL__F_foo.cpp_9647360E_2B1D02D2
>  10000358 D bar()
>  10000358 d bar()
>  10000334 d foo()
>  10000334 D foo()
>  10000340 W std::auto_ptr<int>::auto_ptr(int*)
>  1000034c W std::auto_ptr<int>::~auto_ptr()
> 
> Mmmmh - I cannot relate the failing RLD address of 0x10000364 to the nm output
>

Addresses look weird for a partially linked object.
Did GNU 'ld -r' ever worked for AIX ?

Tristan.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]