[Bug ld/13600] protected visibility creates bogus relocation

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13600

--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-19 
09:16:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Both ld and ld.so go extra efforts to make sure that
> the same function pointer value is used for protected
> function in the entire process.  If we drop this requirement,
> we can simplify ld and ld.so quite a bit.

Well, if we make sure ld.so resolves the GOT entry to the function
address instead of the PLT then that will work - in the module
the protected symbol binds locally we get it resolved to the function
address directly anyway (see GCC assembly from the testcase).

Sounds easier allover the place, no?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.