bug-binutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug binutils/17099] New: BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.24.51.20140628 assertion


From: david.majnemer at gmail dot com
Subject: [Bug binutils/17099] New: BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.24.51.20140628 assertion fail coff-i386.c:509
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 11:20:24 +0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17099

            Bug ID: 17099
           Summary: BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.24.51.20140628 assertion fail
                    coff-i386.c:509
           Product: binutils
           Version: 2.25 (HEAD)
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: binutils
          Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: david.majnemer at gmail dot com

$ cat t.s
        .text
        .def     @feat.00;
        .scl    3;
        .type   0;
        .endef
        .globl  @feat.00
@feat.00 = 1
        .def     _fun;
        .scl    2;
        .type   32;
        .endef
        .globl  _fun
        .align  16, 0x90
_fun:                                   # @fun
# BB#0:
        calll   _ext_fun
        retl


        .globl  _ext_fun
_ext_fun = 0
$ ~/binutils-gdb/gas/as-new t.s -o t.o
$ ~/binutils-gdb/ld/ld-new t.o
~/binutils-gdb/ld/ld-new: BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.24.51.20140628 assertion fail
coff-i386.c:509

I'm guess that ld doesn't like something about that absolute symbol reference,
perhaps as formed an invalid relocation?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]