[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/24262] New: bfd-plugins doesn't respect libdir
From: |
christian.morales.vega at gmail dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/24262] New: bfd-plugins doesn't respect libdir |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Feb 2019 20:20:24 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24262
Bug ID: 24262
Summary: bfd-plugins doesn't respect libdir
Product: binutils
Version: 2.33 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: christian.morales.vega at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
According to
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=blob;f=binutils/doc/binutils.texi;h=01f1e5f56db99e98f6863623e37ab97c93a0244a;hb=HEAD#l554
plugins are searched in @address@hidden/bfd-plugins.
But according to the sources
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=blob;f=bfd/plugin.c;h=f99c4e156b31efe7e7726130bda0c997def4010d;hb=HEAD#l382
it's actually something different.
Not sure why the sources go through the make_relative_prefix thing instead of
actually using libdir. But whatever the case, after reading the docs, I was
expecting my Fedora x86-64 binutils build to look in "/usr/lib64/bfd-plugins",
not in "/usr/lib/bfd-plugins".
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Bug binutils/24262] New: bfd-plugins doesn't respect libdir,
christian.morales.vega at gmail dot com <=