[Bug gas/30856] Regression: operand size mismatch for `push'

[bouanto at zoho dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30856

--- Comment #6 from Antoni Boucher <bouanto at zoho dot com> ---
(In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #5)
> Well, only partly: PUSHQ works, but PUSH (no suffix) doesn't according to my
> testing.

Do you mean that gcc produces invalid asm when using the Intel syntax and
should be using pushq?
I was under the impression that suffixes like q was ATT syntax, but I couldn't
find any reference of the intel syntax allowed in GNU as. It does seem to allow
pushq even for the Intel syntax, though.

Other assemblers allow "push qword".

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.