[Bug ld/23935] [Regression] ld.bfd does not rescan fat LTO archives to r

bug-binutils

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug ld/23935] [Regression] ld.bfd does not rescan fat LTO archives to r

From:	sam at gentoo dot org
Subject:	[Bug ld/23935] [Regression] ld.bfd does not rescan fat LTO archives to resolve plugin-added references
Date:	Fri, 15 Mar 2024 09:33:19 +0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23935

Sam James <sam at gentoo dot org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |sam at gentoo dot org

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

[Bug ld/23935] [Regression] ld.bfd does not rescan fat LTO archives to resolve plugin-added references, sam at gentoo dot org <=
- [Bug ld/23935] [Regression] ld.bfd does not rescan fat LTO archives to resolve plugin-added references, sam at gentoo dot org, 2024/03/25
- [Bug ld/23935] [Regression] ld.bfd does not rescan fat LTO archives to resolve plugin-added references, sam at gentoo dot org, 2024/03/25
- [Bug ld/23935] [Regression] ld.bfd does not rescan fat LTO archives to resolve plugin-added references, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org, 2024/03/26
- [Bug ld/23935] [Regression] ld.bfd does not rescan fat LTO archives to resolve plugin-added references, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2024/03/26

Prev by Date: [Bug ld/18836] ld handles .gnu.lto_ prefixed sections oddly, /DISCARD/ semantics unclear
Next by Date: [Bug ld/31482] The first definition in shared object and archive is ignored
Previous by thread: [Bug ld/18836] ld handles .gnu.lto_ prefixed sections oddly, /DISCARD/ semantics unclear
Next by thread: [Bug ld/23935] [Regression] ld.bfd does not rescan fat LTO archives to resolve plugin-added references
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread